Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 score. Although Google Pixel 3 is older and a little bit thicker than OPPO Reno4 Pro, it's construction is still a bit lighter. Google Pixel 3 features a CPU that is very similar to the processor in OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although the Google Pixel 3 has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a just a bit lower quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400. OPPO Reno4 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
OPPO Reno4 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture for better captures and videos in low-light situations, a lot better resolution camera and a way larger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.