Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a general score of 80.7, which is much better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 global score. Although it's the best we are comparing, it must be noted that it is also older, somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit larger screen.
The Google Pixel 3 XL and OPPO Reno4 Pro count with extremely similar processing units, and although the Google Pixel 3 XL has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a much better memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal storage.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, a much bigger camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos and a bigger camera aperture.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 17 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.