Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has a general score of 78.8, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 general score. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 3a has newer 11 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version, giving you some extra features and increased performance. Google Pixel 3a is an older and a bit thicker cellphone than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, but Google was able to make it just a bit lighter anyway.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a quite worse amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger screen.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a bigger diafragm aperture and a lot larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno4 Pro has better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.