Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a global score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's global score of 72.1. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Google Pixel 3a XL has 11 version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10. Google Pixel 3a XL is an older, a little bit heavier and a bit thicker cellphone than the OPPO Reno4 Pro.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. OPPO Reno4 Pro features a better display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a just a little higher pixel quantity in each inch of screen, a bit larger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a very superior memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno4 Pro has a superior camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a larger camera aperture for better photography in low-light situations, a way bigger camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures and a back camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a little longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.