Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is much better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, having an 81.9 score against 72.1. Despite being the best in this review, the Google Pixel 4 construction is older, a little heavier and a bit thicker than the OPPO Reno4 Pro. OPPO Reno4 Pro features a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a just a little worse display pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit larger screen.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 4 has just a little better processing power than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery capacity. The OPPO Reno4 Pro takes better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs and a way more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.