Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's overall score of 72.1. Even being the best device in this comparison review, Google Pixel 4 XL's body is older, a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than OPPO Reno4 Pro. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit inferior amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit better processor than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a superior storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a F1.7 camera aperture, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor providing a much better image quality and a much better 48 MP resolution camera in the back.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.