Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has an overall score of 82.9, which is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's global score of 72.1. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a has a more recent 11 version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10. The Google Pixel 4a body is just a bit thicker but lighter than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, and they were released only a couple of months apart.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little bit lower amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little larger screen. OPPO Reno4 Pro and Google Pixel 4a both feature very similar storage capacity for apps and games, both of them have equal internal storage.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 27% more battery capacity. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a better camera than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.