Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is a lot better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's score of 72.1. Google Pixel 4a 5G's construction is just a little bit thicker and just a little heavier than OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has a more recent 11 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version, giving you some nice extra features and performance enhancements.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a quite lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a bit larger display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The OPPO Reno4 Pro and the Google Pixel 4a 5G both have extremely similar memory capacity to store more apps and games, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G and OPPO Reno4 Pro both count with extremely similar processors, and although the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The OPPO Reno4 Pro takes better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have a F1.7 camera aperture and the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better 48 MP resolution and a much bigger camera sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has just a little bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 3% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.