Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is way better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, with an 89 score against 72.1. The Google Pixel 5 construction is just a bit lighter but a little thicker than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, and they were only released with a couple of months difference. The Google Pixel 5 counts with just a little better performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a just a little inferior amount of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit larger screen. OPPO Reno4 Pro and Google Pixel 5 have incredibly similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 5 has a little better battery duration than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. OPPO Reno4 Pro takes much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution and a lot bigger sensor which gives a much better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.