Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has a score of 77.7, which is slightly better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 global score. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the HTC One M9 has an older 5.0 version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10. The HTC One M9 is a notably older and extremely thicker cellphone than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, but HTC was able to build it just a little lighter anyway.
HTC One M9 features a bit more vivid display than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a little bit higher screen pixels density. OPPO Reno4 Pro features much more storage for games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
HTC One M9 has a bit more powerful processing unit than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64-bit CPU. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a back camera with much more mega-pixels, a lot larger camera aperture to capture better photos and video in low light environments and a larger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.