Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra is slightly better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a 77 score against 72.1. HTC U Ultra is an a lot older, just a bit thicker and a little bit heavier cellphone than the OPPO Reno4 Pro. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a little better performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger number of faster cores and more RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a little bit better looking display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a just a bit worse pixel number per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite bigger screen. The HTC U Ultra counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro features superior battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 33 percent larger battery size. The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a back facing camera with much more mega pixels, a bigger aperture to capture better photography in low light environments and a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.