Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, having a global score of 77.6 against 72.1. Although HTC U11 is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, we must highlight that it's also a incredibly older, just a bit thicker and a little heavier cellphone. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a slightly better display than HTC U11, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a larger display.
HTC U11's processor is just as good as the CPU in OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although the HTC U11 has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has slightly more storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features longer battery performance than HTC U11, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. OPPO Reno4 Pro captures better photographs and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size camera aperture, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a back facing camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.