Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-08-05 | 2016-03-31 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G5 is just a bit better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, having a 76.1 score against 72.1. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS, but the LG G5 has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives some extra features and optimized performance. LG G5's construction is just a little bit lighter and a little thinner than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it was released many years before.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has just a bit better performance than LG G5, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. OPPO Reno4 Pro features a bit better screen than LG G5, because although it has a lot worse pixel count per inch of display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a bigger display.
The LG G5 counts with a superior memory capacity for applications and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a really longer battery life than LG G5, because it has a 43% more battery size.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro takes much better pictures and videos than LG G5, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low-light environments, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality and a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.