Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-08-05 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is much better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a global score of 81 against 72.1. Even being the best we compare here, the LG G7 ThinQ body is much older, a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier than OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but LG G7 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version.
LG G7 ThinQ features a bit more vivid display than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a quite opaque screen and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a better pixels number in each inch in the display. The LG G7 ThinQ has a bit better processor than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a much better storage for apps and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Reno4 Pro features longer battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.