Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8 ThinQ has an overall score of 84.3, which is much better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's global score of 72.1. These phones use Android OS, but the LG G8 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version, giving you some nice extra features and enhanced performance. Even being the best we are comparing, it must be noted that it's also older, a little heavier and a bit thicker.
The LG G8 ThinQ has just a bit better looking display than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has much more opaque display and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a higher screen pixels density. The LG G8 ThinQ has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G8 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G8 ThinQ features a bit better processing power than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. OPPO Reno4 Pro has just a bit longer battery lifetime than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The OPPO Reno4 Pro captures better pictures and videos than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.