Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has a score of 82.7, which is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's global score of 72.1. The LG G8X ThinQ construction is older, somewhat heavier and a little thicker than OPPO Reno4 Pro. These phones use the same Android 10 OS, so both should provide the user the same operating system features.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a little sharper display than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a bit more pixels per display inch, a quite bigger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. The LG G8X ThinQ has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little bit better processing power than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. OPPO Reno4 Pro and LG G8X ThinQ both count with very similar battery durations. OPPO Reno4 Pro has a much better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution back camera, a much larger sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and a bigger aperture for better images and videos in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.