Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Titan gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG K92 is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, with an 85.4 score against 72.1. Both phones in this comparison include the same Android 10 OS (operating system). The LG K92 is an a bit thicker and notably heavier phone than OPPO Reno4 Pro. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a better looking screen than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a little better quantity of pixels in each display inch.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features just a little better processing power than LG K92, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. LG K92 has a superior storage to install applications and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG K92's battery life is very similar to OPPO Reno4 Pro's battery performance. The LG K92 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same back camera sensor size, the LG K92 also counts with a much more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.