Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2020-08-05 | 2017-07-21 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.87 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.15 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Q8 is a bit better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, having a 77.2 score against 72.1. Even though the LG Q8 is older and a little bit thicker than OPPO Reno4 Pro, it's design is still just a little bit lighter. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but LG Q8 has a more recent 7.0 Nougat version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a little better processing power than LG Q8, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM. LG Q8 features just a bit better screen than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen and much more opaque display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
OPPO Reno4 Pro takes better pictures and videos than LG Q8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a bigger aperture, a lot larger sensor which provides a much better image and video quality and a lot better 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
LG Q8 features a very superior memory for apps and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with greater battery life than LG Q8, because it has a 33% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.