Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 has a global score of 78.6, which is slightly better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 overall score. Although it's the best we are comparing here, LG V10's design is notably older, thicker and heavier than OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V10 has an older 5.1 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a better processing unit than LG V10, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores. LG V10 has a bit more vivid display than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better number of pixels per screen inch.
OPPO Reno4 Pro captures clearer pictures and videos than LG V10, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited situations, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor and a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
The LG V10 features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with better battery life than LG V10, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.