Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-08-05 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is much better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 general score. The LG V30S ThinQ is an extremely older device than OPPO Reno4 Pro, but LG managed to build it a little bit lighter and a bit thinner. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features and increased performance.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of screen and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little bit bigger display. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little better processing power than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a much better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photos in low light environments, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a way bigger camera sensor and a lot more megapixels camera.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro features superior battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.