Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's overall score of 72.1. The LG V35 ThinQ is an incredibly older phone than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, but LG was able to build it a little lighter and a little thinner anyway. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display and a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little larger screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photos.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has better battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.