Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a global score of 81.2, which is better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's overall score of 72.1. LG V40 ThinQ is a a little heavier cellphone than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, but both are equally thin. Both phones in this comparison include the same Android 10 OS (operating system). The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a little sharper display than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a much lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V40 ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with greater battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The OPPO Reno4 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality and a lot more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.