Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has a general score of 87.6, which is much better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's score of 72.1. Even being the best in this comparison, we must highlight that it's also noticeably heavier and thicker. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but LG V60 ThinQ has newer 11 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and a 8 GB RAM. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a brighter display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a quite greater pixels number in each inch of screen.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a camera in the back with way less mega pixels resolution, a lot lower video quality and a tinier camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ features superior battery life than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.