Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is way better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a global score of 87.1 against 72.1. Even being the best cellphone we are comparing, LG Velvet's body is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier than OPPO Reno4 Pro. OPPO Reno4 Pro has a much better screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little better quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
The LG Velvet features a very superior memory for games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG Velvet also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet's processing unit is very similar to the OPPO Reno4 Pro one, and although the LG Velvet has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a 0.5 inches sensor, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same resolution camera, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture. The LG Velvet counts with a little better battery life than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.