Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is way better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, with an 87.1 score against 72.1. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much newer than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, it is somewhat heavier and thicker. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides the user a couple additional features.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit better looking screen than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a quite worse pixels quantity per inch of display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with much more brightness and a quite bigger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes a bit better photographs and videos than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a camera in the back with more mega-pixels, better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photographs and a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light images and video.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage for applications and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a little better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.