Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Smoke black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Power is just a bit better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, having a score of 76.1 against 72.1. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Moto G Power has the newer 11 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version, so it counts with some additional features and enhanced performance. Even being the best we compare here, it must be noted that it is also noticeably thicker and heavier.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a better looking display than Moto G Power, because it has a quite higher pixel density, a little bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Motorola Moto G Power features a greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a much better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a same size camera aperture and the same video definition, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot more MP back facing camera.
The Motorola Moto G Power counts with greater battery performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.