Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, getting a global score of 76.4 against 72.1. Despite of the fact the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition is noticeably older and just a little heavier than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, it's body is still just a bit thinner.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a just a little worse pixels density and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a larger display.
OPPO Reno4 Pro shoots much clearer videos and photos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.