Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a general score of 77.4, which is just a bit better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 overall score. The Moto Z2 Force Edition is an extremely older phone than OPPO Reno4 Pro, but Motorola managed to make it notably thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a slightly better looking display than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a larger screen.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition features much more memory for apps and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a processor that's just as good as OPPO Reno4 Pro's processing unit, and although the Moto Z2 Force Edition has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro captures greater photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a way larger sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality, a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a larger aperture.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a way better battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 47 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.