Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z2 Play is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, having a overall score of 77.4 against 72.1. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play body is somewhat lighter and noticeably thinner than OPPO Reno4 Pro, even though it was released 3 years before. The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a more vivid screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bigger screen, a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit better pixel count per inch in the display. The OPPO Reno4 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a camera in the back with way more MP.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Reno4 Pro features longer battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.