Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-08-05 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 is a little bit better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, having a overall score of 77.6 against 72.1. Moto Z3 is an older cellphone than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, but it's just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter anyway. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but Moto Z3 has 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives some nice extra features.
Moto Z3's CPU is very similar to OPPO Reno4 Pro's processor, and although the Moto Z3 has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. OPPO Reno4 Pro features a much better screen than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit larger screen and a bit greater display pixels density.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a larger aperture.
The Moto Z3 features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with improved battery life than Moto Z3, because it has a 33 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.