Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z3 Play is slightly better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, having a global score of 76.3 against 72.1. Even though Motorola Moto Z3 Play is noticeably older than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, it's construction is just a little thinner and a little lighter. OPPO Reno4 Pro has a much better display than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little bit greater screen pixel density, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit larger display.
Motorola Moto Z3 Play features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Reno4 Pro features a little bit better performance than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has more RAM.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro shoots way better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same camera aperture, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a back camera with way more megapixels and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality pictures.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has improved battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.