Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Oxford blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G is much better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, getting a global score of 84.6 against 72.1. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing, we must tell that it's also a somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier cellphone. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has more RAM.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola One 5G, although it has a quite lower screen pixels density, a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite smaller display. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola One 5G. Both of them have a same size aperture, a same resolution camera in the back, a same size back-facing camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates.
Motorola One 5G features a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola One 5G also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One 5G counts with better battery performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.