Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a 79.8 score against 72.1. Despite being the best device we are comparing, Motorola One Hyper's design is heavier and thicker than the OPPO Reno4 Pro. These phones work with Android operating system, but Motorola One Hyper has a more recent 11 version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a much better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a same size display, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a quite higher display pixels density and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a bit better processor than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has more RAM.
Motorola One Hyper features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One Hyper has a battery lifetime that's just as good as OPPO Reno4 Pro's battery duration.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a little bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a way worse 48 megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.