Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision has a score of 80.7, which is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's global score of 72.1. Even being the best cellphone we compare here, Motorola One Vision's construction is older, somewhat thicker and heavier than the OPPO Reno4 Pro. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a little bigger screen.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. OPPO Reno4 Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has just a little better battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh. The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a little bit better camera than Motorola One Vision. Both have a 0.5 inches camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same video frame rate, the same aperture and a 48 mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.