Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Nokia |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Meteor grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a general score of 80.3, which is much better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's overall score of 72.1. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW body is somewhat thicker and notably heavier than OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both of these devices come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a bit more powerful CPU than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a better looking display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a just a little better pixels quantity per screen inch. Nokia 8 V 5G UW captures a bit better pictures and videos than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with faster video frame rates, a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a bigger camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with much more memory for games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a little better battery duration than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.