Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Nokia |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 9 PureView is a bit better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a general score of 76.4 against 72.1. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison, it must be told that it is also older, just a little thicker and a little bit heavier. The Nokia 9 PureView has a bit better performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a slightly better screen than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a much lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite bigger display. OPPO Reno4 Pro has a much better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a bigger aperture, a lot more mega pixels camera and a way bigger sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos.
Nokia 9 PureView's storage to store more games and applications is very similar to OPPO Reno4 Pro's one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Reno4 Pro has superior battery life than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 20 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.