Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Nokia |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 has a general score of 80.8, which is much better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 score. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android OS, but Nokia XR20 has a more recent 11 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version, offering lots of additional features. The Nokia XR20 design is newer than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's, but it's heavier and way thicker.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a little bit better processing power than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with just a bit better display than Nokia XR20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with much more brightness and a little more pixels per inch of screen.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Nokia XR20 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The Nokia XR20 has a bit longer battery lifetime than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery size.
OPPO Reno4 Pro captures clearer photos and videos than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture for better images and video in low light situations and a way better (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.