Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Cyber shade |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S is a bit better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a 75.8 score against 72.1. Despite being the best we are comparing here, nubia Red Magic 3S is an older, a lot thicker and noticeably heavier phone than the OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the nubia Red Magic 3S has a newer 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a much better display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better screen density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit more powerful CPU than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with greater battery performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S takes a little bit better photos and videos than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, the same aperture and a same resolution camera in the back, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a much better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.