Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, getting a global score of 76.1 against 72.1. Samsung Galaxy A22's construction is newer, but somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker than the OPPO Reno4 Pro. These devices have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A22 has 12 version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit larger screen and a better screen pixels density.
Galaxy A22 features much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A22.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have a 48 megapixels resolution camera, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.