Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 5G has a global score of 84.6, which is better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's score of 72.1. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Galaxy A22 5G has the newer 11 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version. The Galaxy A22 5G construction is newer than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's, but it's thicker and notably heavier.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. OPPO Reno4 Pro has a much better display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
OPPO Reno4 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a larger camera aperture and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A22 5G has longer battery life than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.