Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G is better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, having a 79.9 score against 72.1. The Galaxy A25 5G body is way newer, but just a little thicker and heavier than OPPO Reno4 Pro. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A25 5G has newer 14 version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10, so it counts with a couple nice extra features.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a little better display density, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little more brightness. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a way better performance than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Reno4 Pro takes clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a way larger back camera sensor and a larger aperture. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a superior storage for apps and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A25 5G has longer battery duration than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.