Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A30 has a score of 79.6, which is much better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A30 body has the same thickness than OPPO Reno4 Pro, but it is a little bit heavier. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A30, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a little bit greater screen density and a quite bigger screen.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A30, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. Galaxy A30 features a better memory to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photos, a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a back facing camera with lot more MP.
Galaxy A30 counts with a battery life that's very similar to the OPPO Reno4 Pro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.