Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A30s has a global score of 79.8, which is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's score of 72.1. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A30s has a newer 11 version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10. The Samsung Galaxy A30s design has the same thickness than OPPO Reno4 Pro, but it's a little heavier.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a way better display than Galaxy A30s, because it has a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution, way more pixels per inch of screen and a little bigger display.
The Galaxy A30s counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A30s also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A30s features a battery lifetime that is just as good as the battery lifetime in OPPO Reno4 Pro.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a greater camera than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a much better video definition and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.