Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A31 has a score of 81.3, which is much better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 score. Although Samsung Galaxy A31 is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, we must note that it is also heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 OS, so they should provide all the same OS features.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a little better performance than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has more RAM. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a much better display than Galaxy A31, because although it has a little bit lower pixels density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy A31 features a greater storage to install applications and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A31 has improved battery duration than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
OPPO Reno4 Pro takes clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back and the same sensor size, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.