Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | -- |
| Silky white and Starry night | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a general score of 82, which is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 general score. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A32 LTE Only has 11 version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version, giving a couple nice extra features and improved performance. Although Galaxy A32 LTE Only and OPPO Reno4 Pro were released with only a couple of months difference, Galaxy A32 LTE Only's body is lighter but also just a little bit thicker than OPPO Reno4 Pro.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a little bit better performance than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has more RAM memory. OPPO Reno4 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a quite lower screen density, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a little bit larger display and a brighter display.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a superior memory for apps and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a lot lower resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture, a way better video definition and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has improved battery duration than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.