Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, getting a overall score of 79.4 against 72.1. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A35 5G has the newer 14 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10, providing the user some nice extra features and increased performance. Galaxy A35 5G's body is newer than OPPO Reno4 Pro's, but it's noticeably heavier and a little thicker.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a lot brighter display and a quite higher screen pixels density. OPPO Reno4 Pro features a much better processing power than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A35 5G's memory capacity for apps and games is very similar to the OPPO Reno4 Pro one, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a less mega-pixels resolution camera, a tinier back camera sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with superior battery duration than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.