Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is a lot better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a score of 86.6 against 72.1. These phones work with the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that. The Galaxy A50s is a just a little bit heavier phone than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, but both of them are 0.3inches thick.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a processing unit that's very similar to the processor in OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although the Samsung Galaxy A50s has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A50s, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a little more pixels per inch in the display and a quite larger display.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rate, a same size sensor and a same resolution back-facing camera, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a larger camera aperture for better low light images and videos.
Galaxy A50s's battery life is just as good as the OPPO Reno4 Pro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.