Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Prism cube black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a lot better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, getting a 90.8 score against 72.1. Although it's the best in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than the OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a newer 11 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G. They have a better pixels amount per display inch, an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a screen with the same size. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. OPPO Reno4 Pro shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a 48 MP camera in the back, the same camera sensor size, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features just a little bit longer battery life than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.