Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is way better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's global score of 72.1. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10, providing you some additional features and increased performance. The Galaxy A52 5G design is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the OPPO Reno4 Pro.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a much better display than Galaxy A52 5G. Both of them have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a display of the same size. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1 TB.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A52 5G features just a bit longer battery life than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A52 5G captures a bit better videos and photos than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a bigger sensor and a camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.