Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is way better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a global score of 91.1 against 72.1. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has 11 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy A52s's design is newer than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's, but it's somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A52s. They have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, a same size screen and the same display pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy A52s and OPPO Reno4 Pro both have very similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52s has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A52s features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52s also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features just a bit better camera than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution and a larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a bit longer battery performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 13 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.